|
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
|
|
Orders Pronounced November 1, 2024
|
| |
|
ORDERS ON CAUSES
|
|
24-0366
|
IN THE ESTATE OF BILLY WAYNE PHILLIPS, DECEASED; from Hunt County; 6th Court of Appeals District (06-23-00017-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 02-08-24)
|
| |
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to that court.
Per Curiam Opinion
|
|
THE MOTION IN THE FOLLOWING CAUSE IS DENIED:
|
|
24-0714
|
GARY PEREZ; MATILDE TORRES v. CITY OF SAN ANTONIO (U.S. Fifth Circuit 23-50746)
|
| |
motion to expand argument time and to participate in argument as amicus curiae denied
|
| |
Justice Busby would grant the motion in part and allow amicus to participate in oral argument by sharing five minutes of appellants' time if appellants consent, and he does not understand the Court's order to foreclose such participation.
Justice Blacklock notes his dissent from the Court's denial of the motion for participation in oral argument.
|
|
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR REVIEW IS DENIED:
|
|
24-0877
|
IN THE INTEREST OF K.E.S., K.Y.S., AND K.A.S., CHILDREN; from Hill County; 10th Court of Appeals District (10-24-00138-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 09-12-24)
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR REVIEW IS DISMISSED:
|
|
24-0770
|
DINA S. KASWATUKA v. STONERIDGE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION; from Tarrant County; 2nd Court of Appeals District (02-24-00051-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-08-24)
|
| |
|
|
ORDERS ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING
|
|
THE MOTION FOR REHEARING OF THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR REVIEW IS DENIED:
|
|
24-0390
|
IN THE ESTATE OF ROBERT S. KAM, DECEASED; from Dallas County; 5th Court of Appeals District (05-22-01049-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-18-24)
|
|
THE MOTION FOR REHEARING OF THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS DENIED:
|
|
24-0608
|
IN RE PAUL E. NUNU; from Harris County; 14th Court of Appeals District (14-22-00201-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 08-04-22)
|
| |
|
| |
(Justice Devine not participating)
|
|
MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS DENIED:
|
|
24-0912
|
IN RE ART AGUILAR; from Montgomery County; 9th Court of Appeals District (09-24-00248-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 10-24-24)
|
| |
motion for emergency temporary relief denied
|
|
THE FOLLOWING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS IS DISMISSED:
|
|
24-0738
|
IN RE BERNARDIST D. LEE; from Dallas County; 5th Court of Appeals District (05-24-00452-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 07-08-24)
|
| |
|
