Johnson, J., filed a concurring
opinion.
CONCURRING OPINION
I agree that the trial court impliedly found that Mr. Rudd qualified as an expert. On that basis, I believe that Mr. Rudd's testimony was of the type which is contemplated by Tex. R. Crim. Evid. 703, and was therefore properly admitted. With that comment, I join the opinion of the court.
Johnson, J.
Date Delivered: June 28, 2000
Publish