IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS



NO. 74,620

 

EX PARTE RANDALL VALENTINO GONZALES, Applicant
 




ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per Curiam.


OPINION



This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus which was transmitted to this Court by the clerk of the trial court pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07, V.A.C.C.P. Ex Parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of the offense of aggravated robbery and punishment was assessed at twenty years imprisonment. Applicant's conviction was affirmed on appeal. Gonzales v. State, No. 14-00-00702-CR (Tex. App.- Houston [14th Dist.], delivered January 31, 2002, pet. ref'd, untimely filed).

Applicant contends that he has been denied an opportunity to file a timely petition for discretionary review. The record supports Applicant's allegation.

Applicant is entitled to relief. The proper remedy is to return Applicant to the point at which he can file a petition for discretionary review. He may then follow the proper procedures in order that a meaningful petition for discretionary review may be filed. For purposes of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all time limits, including mandate, shall be calculated as if the Court of Appeals' decision had been rendered on the day the mandate of the Court in this cause issues. We hold that should Applicant desire to seek discretionary review, he must take affirmative steps to see that his petition is filed in the Court of Appeals within thirty days after the mandate of this Court has issued.



DELIVERED: April 9, 2003

DO NOT PUBLISH